Revealed: How the OPCW Manipulated Douma ‘Chemical Attack’ Report

There can be no doubt: Douma was an orchestrated hoax and OPCW executives actively worked to cover it up.


We’re told that The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is supposed to be an unbias and ‘neutral’ international body, with no political or state affiliations that might compromise or influence the findings of its supposedly objective mission.

However, this no longer appears to be the case. In recent months, two OPCW whistleblowers have bravely come forward to confirm what many had long suspected – that this organization has in fact been co-opted at the executive level, resulting in pressure put to bear on its staff and experts to generate conclusions which were in-line with the policies of the US and UK governments. As a result, the OPCW has been caught suppressing evidence and manipulating its findings in its investigation into alleged “chemical weapons” in Douma, Syria which western governments had claimed took in April 2018.

There can be no doubt any longer: Douma was an orchestrated hoax, and the OPCW executives actively worked to cover it up.