One of the main factors driving the current ‘global pandemic’ narrative has been the misuse of the supposed ‘gold standard’ for COVID diagnosis, the RT-PCR Test. The near universal misuse of the PCR as a diagnostic tool for labeling people as “infected” with the ‘novel coronavirus’ has led to millions of designations of alleged COVID-19 “cases”, which means that the true number of actual cases (according to the clinical medical definition of a ‘case’) is certain to be much less by orders of magnitude.
Aside from the general widespread fraudulent use of the PCR Test during this ‘global pandemic’, there are also a number of very identifiable technical problems associated with it. These have been quietly admitted by numerous members of the scientific and medical establishment, but systematically avoided by both mainstream media and public health officials for fear that any bad publicity regarding the fatally flawed PCR testing and COVID-19 might derail the pandemic narrative and threaten to delegitimise all of the draconian policies and bio-surveillance industrial and social engineering applications associated with it. Some technical flaws include the widespread contamination during sampling, contamination of reagents, sample cross-contamination, and other cross-reactions of viruses and genetic material that are responsible for false-positive test results. As The Lancet medical journal stated in September 2020:
Any diagnostic test result should be interpreted in the context of the pretest probability of disease. For COVID-19, the pretest probability assessment includes symptoms, previous medical history of COVID-19 or presence of antibodies, any potential exposure to COVID-19, and likelihood of an alternative diagnosis.
When low pretest probability exists, positive results should be interpreted with caution and a second specimen tested for confirmation. Notably, current policies in the UK and globally do not include special provisions for those who test positive despite being asymptomatic and having laboratory confirmed COVID-19 in the past (by RT-PCR swab test or antibodies).
Even the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) was forced to withdraw testing kits in March 2020, after they were shown to have generated a high rate of false-positives due to reagent contamination. Also, for many months now, many reputable scientists have demonstrated how using high Cycle Threshold counts (CT values) will most certainly produce false positive test results. But it was too late – the false positive data from all of these PCR tests had already triggered a global hysteria, eventually leading to mask mandates, school closures, and destructive lockdowns instigated by out of control governments chasing what very well may have been a phantom menace.
In short, the evidence is so overwhelming which should render any policies derived from PCR testing data null and void, that’s it is simply breathtaking how this systematic fraud has been able to persist for the last 12 months.
Most notably, even the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR technology, the late Dr. Karry Mullis, warned that his invention should never be used as a medical diagnostic test. Many have pointed this out since COVID crisis began – only to be attacked by mainstream media and establishment trolls on social media in a sustained smear campaign against Mullis.
In this video, Dr Sam Bailey, co-author of Virus Mania discusses the life of Dr. Mullis, his background, and why he came into such conflict with much of the medical and scientific establishment.
See reference links for this interview
WATCH MORE COVID-19 NEWS HERE
